Earning Guide: $GRAM Liquid Staking vs Wallet Yield

Strategy: Maximizing $GRAM Yield

This strategy compares direct wallet yielding versus liquid staking to unlock further DeFi opportunities.

Strategy Overview

  • Potential Profit: 13.4% (Tonstakers) or 14.6% (@Wallet/high-yield option); additional ~3% through STON.fi LP if using tsTON
  • Required Assets: $GRAM tokens
  • Complexity: Medium (due to optional liquidity re-deployment steps)

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Choose your path for maximum return on principal:
    - For higher immediate passive yield, use the ability in @Wallet which offers 14.6%.
    - Alternatively, use Tonstakers for a 13.4% way that provides liquid receipt tokens ($tsTON).
  2. Optional - Maximize Liquid Tokens via DeFi (If choosing Tonstakers):
    - Stake $GRAM into Tonstakers to receive certain amount of tsTON tokens.
    - Transfer these tsTON_tokens to any DEX like STON.fi.
    - Add them to the stTON/$GRAM pool under 3% profit margin to increase overall efficiency. Or alternatively, use tsTON as collateral in the EVAA lending protocol.

Secondary Opportunity: Hattori Claims

  • Check HATTORI balance/unlocks; claim pending funds and swap or transfer back to TON wallet if available personally accumulated rewards.

Risk & Safety Note

* Risk Warning: Users should note that while staking in Wallet is more profitable at 14.6%, it lacks liquidity compared to Tonstakers. When moving assets to pools such as stTON/$GRAM on STON.fi or using EVAA, ensure you account for potential smart contract interactions으로 secondary yield optimization.

! DYOR (Do Your Own Research)